Dimbulb Pictures: Someone Else Speaks

What was that? I CAN quote you?

"The 'big dicks' are threatening to 'leave' -- except they'll 'keep a
small office in Vancouver' -- chickenshit bullshitters. Tremendous
backlash in the Sun today -- editorials AND business section both
concluding that subsidies are not the answer for any business -- no
matter where they are -- and that 'if it's that easy to leave, it's
that easy to come back, so go ahead' -- running right along an article
stating that 'Anagram Pictures is also considering taking their 10.5
million dollar 'Fido' to Sask (which they were planning to do LAST
YEAR!!!), as well as Avanti Pictures and their 3.5 million first
feature, and a third company -- their name escapes me. Bunch a fuckin'
wanks. They're making the whole film industry look like a bunch of
sissy nose-bleeders. Let's see, why don't they take their balls and put
them on the line -- as in get HARD private money and make a film like
the Yanks do? Pansy-asses...and you can't quote me on that...(Ed: oops, too late...)
The Sun article ends stating if Dimbulb Pictures leaves, then the
industry is good as 'dead'. Telefilm must be excited by the prospect..."

Hmmm, you mean a company that relies on government incentives to operate, isn't financially viable?